لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Due to the recent amendment, the court imposed a more severe sentence than would have been doable under the previous Edition on the law.
limitation of liability towards the extent of a cap provided through the registered mortgage deed(Banking Regulation)
twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons obtaining their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to accomplish absent with the candidature of the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Preceding four tax years interpreted. It's not necessarily from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually effectively-settled that although looking at the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to think about the advantage of all the eligible candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of qualified here candidates who're found for being most meritorious amongst them. Because the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked with the respondent department just to increase favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part on the respondent department.
The Court deemed the case to become maintainable under Article 184 (three) since the Risk and encroachment alleged were such as to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
Section 302 of the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be topic to the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani law.
Knowledge from the accused is usually a matter to be inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is very hard being proved otherwise.”
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load given to any reported judgment may perhaps depend upon the reputation of both the reporter as well as the judges.[7]
To invoke section 300 and 302 just because death has occurred is the biggest tragedy of all. It does the exact opposite of what a legal system is there to do, i.e. protected its citizens.
13309-B of 2010 to be weak types of evidence as well as evidentiary value whereof would be viewed within the time from the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Consequently, confirmed custody of your petitioner in jail is unlikely to serve any helpful purpose at this stage.”
fourteen. During the light of your position explained higher than, it is actually concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be viewed as for no fault of his have and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency during the duration of service or in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Read more